JMS on Usenet

Message

Subject: Re: Attn JMS: taste; was: various bounced replies from jms
Date: 27 Feb 2001 22:41:58 -0700
From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated

>Since I'm not the only person who made that inference - and no, we're not in
>collusion -  you might want to go back and read what you wrote again.

I know what I wrote, and it had nothing to do with the inference you raise
here. The problem is that one knee-jerk response fuels the next knee-jerk
response.

I never, ever said that books by Lewis should be isolated in the religion area.
 Didn't say it, or imply it.  I'm not liable for escalating misinterpretations
that fuel each other into hysteria.

 jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2001 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)