JMS on Usenet

Message

Subject: Re: And So It Begins...
Date: 26 May 2003 03:14:33 GMT
From: jmsatb5@aol.com (Jms at B5)
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated

>To answer this one point, while there is no direct connection to the 9/11
>attacks, there is a link to Al Qaeda. A week into the campaign, the man
>thought to be responsible for the original car bombing of the WTC was
>captured in Iraq. And in Saddam's Iraq, if Saddam hadn't wanted hm there,
>the only way he would have stayed would have been six feet under. Think
>about it.

Okay.

Mmmmm....nope, sorry.

That the guy was there after the fact doesn't prove that Saddam was involved
before the fact.  Doesn't even hint at it.  It's all ex post facto reasoning.

Wouldn't stand up in any court in the land.

 jms

(jmsatb5@aol.com)
(all message content (c) 2003 by synthetic worlds, ltd., 
permission to reprint specifically denied to SFX Magazine 
and don't send me story ideas)